II · 04 Politics — Agriculture Policy

The business of farming

Competitiveness, relief and planning certainty are the core of Alois Rainer’s agricultural policy. Environmental and animal-welfare groups question what is being traded away to deliver them. This chapter sets out both.

Current office Government policy Competing views

Alois Rainer, in a blue suit, standing beside another man in front of a large tractor with red wheel rims
Beside modern farm machinery at an agricultural event.

German agriculture in numbers · Agricultural Structure Survey 2023

Farms
255,000

About 7,800 fewer than in 2020.

Farmland
16.6m ha

Close to half of Germany’s land area.

Average farm
65 ha

Large regional differences between east and south.

Workforce
876,000

45 % family members, 28 % seasonal workers.

Organic farms
11 %

28,700 farms on 1.85m hectares.

Source: Federal Statistical Office (Destatis), press release 021/2024 and 176/2024. The share of land area is this site’s calculation from Destatis figures.

The agenda

Eight files on the desk

Each file shows the government’s policy, the case made for it and the main objections. Where the evidence is still open, we say so.

01

Agricultural diesel: the refund restored

Government policy In force since 1 Jan 2026

Policy

The Bundestag voted on 6 November 2025 to restore the full energy-tax refund on agricultural diesel, 21.48 cents per litre, from 1 January 2026. This reversed the phase-out decided by the previous government in 2024, which had triggered nationwide farmer protests. It costs around €430 million a year.

Supporters say

Farmers in neighbouring EU states receive comparable relief, and German farms had lost competitiveness. The coalition presented the decision as a promise kept.

Critics say

The Federal Environment Agency (UBA) lists the agricultural diesel concession among environmentally harmful subsidies. Critics argue it keeps fossil diesel cheap and uses public money that could support other aims.

Unresolved

How far the refund changes farm incomes compared with prices, wages and energy costs, and how it fits with Germany’s goal of reducing environmentally harmful subsidies.

Source: top agrar, November 2025.

02

Bureaucracy reduction and planning certainty

Government policy

Policy

In June 2025 the cabinet took note of the end of the nutrient-balance regulation (Stoffstrombilanzverordnung), with estimated savings for farms of about €18 million a year. A further package to roll back agricultural bureaucracy is being prepared for 2026.

Supporters say

Farmers spend a growing share of their working time on documentation. Duplicate reporting obligations and frequent rule changes make long-term investment harder.

Critics say

The regulation was introduced in 2018 as part of Germany’s response to EU proceedings over nitrate pollution of groundwater. Critics fear that removing it weakens the monitoring of nutrient flows.

Unresolved

Which obligations can be removed without weakening standards, and whether the savings are felt on farms.

Source: Federal Government, bureaucracy reduction in agriculture.

03

Farm income and competitiveness

Analysis

Farm incomes in Germany swing widely with world-market prices, weather and input costs. The 2026 drought harvest, with grain down 7.3 % on the previous year, showed how quickly a good year can turn. The ministry announced around €1 billion in liquidity aid after the harvest report.

The government’s approach combines cost relief (diesel), less bureaucracy, export promotion and crisis support. Critics from environmental and smaller-farm organisations argue that the structural problem lies elsewhere: the market power of processors and retailers, and support systems that reward land area rather than public goods.

04

Labour: the seasonal workers question

Documented episode Criticism

What happened

In June 2025, as the statutory minimum wage was set to rise, Rainer had possible exemptions for seasonal agricultural workers examined. The farmers’ association had asked for a lower rate. In July 2025 a legal review by his own ministry concluded that such exemptions would be unconstitutional.

Objections

The SPD, the Federal Labour Minister and the trade union IG BAU rejected the idea from the start. The farmers’ association called the outcome a “black day” for fruit and vegetable growers.

Why it matters

Seasonal workers make up about 28 % of the agricultural workforce. Labour costs are decisive for labour-intensive crops such as asparagus, strawberries and vegetables, where Germany already depends heavily on imports.

Source: Legal Tribune Online, July 2025.

05

Exports and market access

Government policy

Policy

In December 2025 the ministry presented an export strategy, “Modern agricultural exports Made in Germany”. It creates an export coordinator and an export chief veterinary officer and restores the trade-fair budget to €17 million.

Supporters say

Veterinary certificates and market-access agreements decide whether German products such as pork, dairy and genetics can be sold abroad. Diversifying markets reduces risk.

Critics say

Groups in the “Wir haben es satt!” alliance argue that an export focus favours intensive livestock farming and global price competition over regional, more sustainable production.

Unresolved

Which markets open, and how export promotion fits with animal-welfare and climate goals.

Source: top agrar, December 2025; Wir haben es satt!, January 2026.

06

Young farmers, succession and investment

Analysis

Every year thousands of farms close, often when no family member takes over. The decision to continue depends on whether investment in new barns, machinery or technology can be paid back. That in turn depends on whether the rules will still apply when the loan is repaid.

This is why “planning certainty” (Planungssicherheit) appears so often in the ministry’s statements. The postponement of the state livestock-housing label to 2027 and the end of the federal programme for rebuilding livestock housing are read in two ways. Supporters see a pause to make the rules workable. Critics see a loss of the very reliability young farmers need to invest in higher animal-welfare standards.

07

Technology, plant protection and the wolf

Government policy

Plant protection

Faster approvals of plant protection products were among the topics of his June 2026 question time in the Bundestag. Farmers’ groups say slow approvals leave them with fewer tools than competitors. Environmental groups stress biodiversity and water protection.

The wolf

A law bringing the wolf under federal hunting law passed the Bundestag on 5 March 2026 with votes from the CDU/CSU, SPD and AfD. The Greens and the Left voted against. It came into force in April 2026.

Sources: Bundestag, week 24/2026; Bundestag, week 10/2026.

08

The Common Agricultural Policy after 2027

Documented statement

The European Commission’s proposal of July 2025 for the next EU budget would fundamentally restructure farm support. Rainer has said he is not categorically opposed to capping direct payments for large farms, but he rejected a cap of €100,000 at the 2026 German Farmers’ Day, arguing that such a limit would not fit Germany’s farm structures. See European Agriculture.

Source: top agrar on the CAP reform and capping.

The budget

€6.99 billion

The 2026 federal agriculture budget, passed by the Bundestag on 27 November 2025. The 2027 draft foresees €6.97 billion.

The largest single item in the agriculture budget is not farm support but agricultural social insurance: subsidies for farmers’ pensions, health and accident insurance. The second big block is the joint federal-state task for improving agricultural structures and coastal protection (GAK). EU direct payments to farmers come from the EU budget and are not part of this figure.

Sources: top agrar, budget 2026; Bundestag, budget 2027 first reading, September 2026.